Search for: "Carr v. Unknown Defendants"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2019, 12:22 pm
If the defendant "knew the risk and decided it was best not to remove it" then that is a factor in favor of maintaining the status quo and granting an injunction (see Aldous LJ in SmithKline Beecham v Apotex [2003] FSR 31 at [40]; see also Arnold J in Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2015] EWHC 72 at [133]). [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 2:30 pm
In the first case, Fujifilm v AbbVie [2017] EWHC 395 (Pat), the effect of the declaration on preliminary injunctions abroad was one, but not the only reason for which Henry Carr J concluded that it would serve a useful purpose. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
“That SJS/TEN may be more predictable in the future if a particular discovery is made says nothing about Defendants’ negligence. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am
In an 1838 case, Buddington v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
On 18 May 2023 there was a trial of preliminary issues in the case of Carr v Carr. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Carr, which, it has been suggested, helped to trigger Frankfurter's stroke and retirement from the Court. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am
Nicklin J refused to accept certain undertakings offered by the defendant in a harassment case but gave the claimant permission to appeal. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am
The claimant’s solicitor explained that the defendant, the General Secretary of the University and College Union, had defamed the claimant in tweets that falsely portrayed him as a misogynist, pervert and a liar in response to his criticism of the anti-social behaviour of passengers on his train. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
The identity of the defendant is known to the plaintiff. 2. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 30 November 2020 Nicklin J heard an application in the case of HJK v Persons Unknown. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 7:55 am
The lawsuit reads like a John le Carre novel, full of international intrigue and allegations of enforced disappearance, involuntary servitude and a secret police force. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
Lady Justice Carr admitted the sentences were severe, but added “we have concluded that they were not manifestly excessive; nor did they amount to a disproportionate interference with their rights of freedom of expression and assembly. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 8:40 am
It is the unlawful theft of personal data by persons unknown, spurred on by an irresponsible press that has now created the conditions for a trade in misappropriated data. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm
Brott v. [read post]
